The Case for Optimism

Michael Rozeff has an important piece out at LRC today, The War Against Antifa/BLM, he explains how utterly insane the Antifa/BLM movement is.

He concludes:

The antifa/BLM thinking and agenda are so far out as to appear psychotic or mad, and they are. No one in his right mind who understands what antifa and BLM are aiming for can possibly support them. What is the current society supposed to be replaced by? Communism? An equally bad social democracy? Nonetheless, for various reasons, antifa/BLM is receiving support and backing, and we are in for a war of sorts to suppress their criminal rampages and violations of decent people and decent order.

This is a big challenge, but it will be met because most Americans have the good sense to know that antifa/BLM means them no good whatsoever.

I consider this the optimistic case.

In the land, we are starting to see resistance develop to the madness. Leaders are starting to emerge. Indeed, I highlighted one of them just the other day in Carlos Zapata.

There are others. Indeed, I suspect that some youth that were touched by the Ron Paul presidential campaigns of 2008 and 2012 may emerge soon. Not many, perhaps a half-dozen or maybe a dozen that heard Dr. Paul in their late teens or twenties and have been absorbing libertarian writings ever since and are born leaders. They have absorbed enough to take the next step and it is not a day too soon.

But periods like this are extremely complex and it is not clear how things will turn out.

The economist G.L. S. Shackle used to write about what he called kalidescopic periods. He wrote in Epistemics & Economics: A critique of economic doctrines (1991) P76:

It will be a kaleidic society, interspersing its moments or intervals of order assurance and beauty with sudden disintegration and a cascade into a new pattern. Such an account of the politico-economic process may at various epochs or in the course of various historical ages appear less or more suggestive and illuminating.

We are currently in this type of kalidescopic period. Austrian school economists understand the difficulty of forecasting the future at any time. The economist Walter Block says that economists forecasting the future proves they have a sense of humor.

But sometimes we can get general trends right. I discussed this point with Murray Rothbard once and he agreed but the specifics are impossible.

And when you have a point like the present, it is impossible. There are much too many moving parts. The kaleidoscope is spinning, what the pieces look like when it stops is impossible to tell.

Here is what we could have seen already.

Rozeff quotes the Daily Caller:

From the very start of the Trump administration, far-left actors declared their intention to use massive demonstrations to disrupt the American political process as much as possible.

This should not have come as a surprise. I wrote 48 hours after Trump was elected:

Heading into the election, I felt that for strategic reasons Hillary Clinton was the best alternative for libertarians. Not because she is good on many issues, she is not, but because she would come with a ready-made opposition that would listen to libertarian arguments against her.

It would have been a great opportunity to reach out to Trump supporters and spread the libertarian message. That opportunity is now gone with the Trump victory. Trump supporters are rabid, they will likely follow him down almost any hell hole.

These people are not going to listen to our arguments for smaller government. Their man is in power.

There will be opposition to Trump but it will be coming from the left, not the Trump right.

The left is all about expanding the state. Thus, it will be very difficult to reach out to these people and present state shrinking anti-Trump ideas. They are a perfect target for the socialists.

Indeed, the protest that occurred in New York City last night, where thousands turned out, was launched by a socialist group, the Socialist Alternative. The socialists are going to experience a boom in followers under Trump.

That these radical lefty anarchists are around should also not come as a surprise either, I wrote, 6 years ago, in 2014:

It is instructive to understand, who is taking part in these protests. The overwhelming majority are generally outraged over the police killings. This group includes students from nearby colleges, aging hippies and assorted northern California lefties.

However, there are two other groups that infiltrate these protests, who do not necessarily share the same outrage as the majority of protesters. One group can best be described as opportunists. They mix in with the crowd and appear to have identified in advance stores that they want to loot for the goods in them. They use the crowds as cover to get their dirty work done...

But in addition to these opportunists, there is another group that infiltrates the protests, anarchists.

These are not Rothbardian anarcho-capitalists, who see problems with governments, banksters and the ruling elite, but see no problem with corporations operating in the private sector (who are not part of the elite). These are full-fledged anarchists, who believe the entire structure of society must be torn down, including,corporations who operate in the private sector and have no strong ties to the government.

A friend familiar with their thinking tells me that they believe that once the entire structure is torn down, out of the ashes, phoenix-like, a new wonderful society will emerge. Thus, they see their current role as being one of wreaking havoc to advance the collapse. And Oakland is a hotbed for these anarchists.

I ran these photos in 2014 with the story. It shows the combination of lefty useful idiots in Oakland and those who want to destroy society (Yes, despite the masks these are 2014 photos):

920x920 (5).jpg
920x920 (3).jpg

Here is the problem. The radical Marxists who want to destroy society are very, very sophisticated in terms of strategy and tactics. They have studied Lenin. They know they have to form alliances with useful idiots because their group, in and of itself is too small. 

In addition to older lefties, they pretty much can move the young to advance their goals--after the years of government financing of postmodern and Critical Theory teaching in colleges and universities. The young have been dumbed down to think central planning is the way to go.

The radical Marxists understand this and they are opportunists. 

They are using the death of mostly black thugs at the hands of police to their advantage.

I have discussed in a podcast dread risk fear,  early on having pictures flashed of how COVID-19 was being treated in China and Italy spooked many Americans, it caused the COVID-19 panic in the US. That panic was dread risk fear. It wasn't logical, it was the beaming of the images that did it.

Something of the same has happened with the anti-police movement.

We saw the pictures of the copper with his knee on George Floyd. Those who react on emotion reacted immediately. It was a type of dread risk fear and then the accomplice mainstream press flooded the airwaves of other cop killings without context, solidifying the great copper dread risk fear. 

As Gerd Gigerenzer, former head of the Max Planck Institute, writes it is pretty much impossible to talk logic to those who have been impacted by such fear, only a greater fear will change their minds. 

So maybe the radical left's attack on restaurants and looting will knock some out of their anti-cop trance (which is really an anti-civilization)  but I suspect that this is what the Marxists behind the curtain want. They want the people to be fearful, so that Trump is re-elected to "fix things." The Marxists know a Trump victory will continue the recruiting of socialists to the cause.

Police I am talking to tell me that they are preparing for a straight 30 days of riots if Trump is elected.

With an election victory behind him, Trump would likely declare a national emergency and order the cracking heads on the streets to begin. How that would turn out is anybody's guess. Right now coppers tell me that it is a period like none they have ever seen. They see hate displayed toward them everywhere. "It's visceral," one copper told me. 

The kaleidoscope is turning. How the pieces look when it stops spinning, I have no idea. There is an optimistic scenario that things do get back to normal but there are other potential scenarios where things end up far from good. 

-RW

BLM leader: Destroy all depictions of Jesus Christ as “white European”

By Rubashov


Black Lives Matter is run by a group of self-described “trained Marxists”.  Not old school, working class Marxists, mind you.  No getting their hands dirty, blue-collar labor for these Marxists, thank you very much. 
 
In the 1960s, Marxist academics like Herbert Marcuse came up with a new form of libertine Marxism based on theories about “identity” that allowed the children of professionals to adopt the fashion of Marxism while living very comfortably in academia or growing fat off corporate grants.  It is this snowflake variety of Marxism that the founders of Black Lives Matter practice. 
 
Just remember that while Karl Marx was impoverished to the point that several of his children starved to death, Herbert Marcuse was something of a playboy whose jobs in academia and books sales made him rather rich.  Which one do you think your average upper-middle class college-educated activist would rather emulate?   
 
Unlike the devotees of Black Lives Matter, Marx was sensitive to the role of class in the American South in the run-up to the Civil War.  In his extensive writings from that period, Marx examined the class divisions inside the Southern states.  When writing about the secession resolutions, for example, Marx portrays the slave-owning class as a small but powerful minority, ruling over both the largely enslaved black population and poor whites.  Yes, Karl Marx understood and made those distinctions.
 
Black Lives Matter is not so intellectually precise as all that – instead preferring blanket condemnations based on skin-color, national origin, and such.  W.E.B. Du Bois would have seen BLM for what they are:  Racialists trapped in a perspective obsessed by skin-color.      
 
Fresh from BLM tearing down General U.S. Grant’s statue over the weekend (yes, General Grant, the man who defeated the Confederacy; yep, they forgot that without Grant there would have been no victory, no freedom, no Juneteenth, no anything) a prominent Black Lives Matter activist named Shaun King on Monday called for the removal of statues, murals and stained glass windows that depict Jesus as a “white European,” which he claimed “are a form of white supremacy.”
 
“Yes, I think the statues of the white European they claim is Jesus should also come down,” King, wrote on Twitter. “They are a form of white supremacy. Always have been.”
 
“In the Bible, when the family of Jesus wanted to hide, and blend in, guess where they went?” he added. “EGYPT! Not Denmark. Tear them down.”
 
“All murals and stained glass windows of white Jesus, and his European mother, and their white friends should also come down,” King wrote in a second tweet. “They are a gross form of white supremacy.”
 
By “white friends” we suppose the BLM honcho was referring to the apostles.  Is this idiot really suggesting that he doesn’t understand that every culture since Ancient Greece has depicted its gods or God in their own image?  People with dog heads went out with Ancient Egypt.  Oh, and by-the-way, Denmark didn't exist until the 8th century  How could anyone have gone to some place that didn't exist yet?
 
Black Lives Matter must harbor levels of malevolence not witnessed since the Taliban destroyed those statues of the Buddha some twenty years ago.  The Taliban insisted that all religions kneel before them.  Remember how the world reacted when they went too far?

In 2001, the Taliban destroyed the world's tallest Buddha statues, which towered over Afghanistan's Bamiyan Valley for centuries. Today, they've risen again ...

As for Shaun King?  Don’t worry about him.  The media reports that he has made millions as a fund-raiser for causes like Black Lives Matter.  Nobody in his family is going to starve.  Snowflake Marxism has been very good to Shaun. 
 
That said, he has attracted attention on how he has spent the money raised for such causes.  The New York Post reports…
 
Activist Shaun King has botched his attempt to recreate abolitionist Frederick Douglass’ newspaper, The North Star, as an online venture — sparking renewed scrutiny over his financial dealings, according to a report Tuesday.
 
King’s new media outlet — which was lauded by such celebs as Susan Sarandon and Megan Mullally — has pulled in between $60,000 and $625,000 a month, depending on various figures he’s provided, the Daily Beast said.
 
Yet it has failed to deliver on nearly every one of his promises, which included building “multiple studios’’ and “hiring nearly 50 world class journalists,” the site said.
 
Read the full story here: 
 

https://nypost.com/2020/05/26/shaun-king-comes-under-scrutiny-over-botched-news-organization/
 

 

“History repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce.”
(Karl Marx, author and philosopher)