Robert’s Rules suggests 14 days’ notice. Morris GOP gives 5 days (over July 4th).

By Rubashov
 
Calling a snap election is a cute trick used by British Prime Ministers, but rarely encountered in America, where fixed terms are the rule. Nevertheless – and in the middle of a long holiday weekend – Morris County GOP Chair Laura Ali has called a snap re-election and scheduled it for next Saturday. Like a British PM, her term of office isn’t up for a year.
 
There’s a further catch to this maneuver. Republicans outside the establishment have until Thursday, July 6th, to present a letter of intent from any candidate hoping to oppose Laura Ali for Chairman. And, if that is not a formidable hurdle enough, there’s this:
 
“The Candidate for Chairperson must put forth a full slate of candidates, for the remaining elected offices (Vice-Chair, Recording Secretary, Corresponding Secretary, Treasurer, Sargent at Arms and Counsel), provide the same information for those candidates as required for Chairperson and what offices they intend to seek.”
 
Maybe Laura Ali uses a British calendar that marks “bank holidays” instead of “Independence Day”? Or perhaps, mindful that the GOP bosses in next-door Sussex County gave their members 10 days’ notice – and then failed to elect the establishment slate – she has opted for half that time.
 
And, in another nod to what happened in Sussex County, Laura Ali’s letter emphasizes this point: “No nominations will be heard from the floor.”
 
As one observer put it:
 
“So Laura really thinks everyone is stupid.
 
Makes this grand gesture on a holiday weekend knowing everyone is not home, then only gives people a few days to build an entire slate.
 
This is a complete joke.”

 
The Soviets held elections too. They didn’t mean anything, and the results were managed to the point of predetermination, but they still could claim to have held an election. Those elections were meant to “unify” their population behind the party leadership but only fools saw anything in the results.
 
The purpose of the democratic process is to tease out the will of the majority and elections are the best tool we have to achieve that end. Elections are a more exact representation of the popular will than any poll or pundit’s opinion.
 
An organization that knowingly skews the process so that an election cannot be representative is only fooling itself. It is cheating at solitaire – kidding itself that the ends its wishes are being achieved. Like the Soviets did, for so many years.
 
Unity, bringing together people who were formerly at war with each other, is a different thing. Abraham Lincoln, our first Republican President knew this:
 
“Quarrel not at all. No man resolved to make the most of himself can spare time for personal contention. Still less can he afford to take all the consequences, including the vitiating of his temper and loss of self-control. Yield larger things to which you can show no more than equal right; and yield lesser ones, though clearly your own. Better give your path to a dog than be bitten by him in contesting for the right. Even killing the dog would not cure the bite.”
 
Had he lived, what would have been the fruits of the reconciliation he had planned?
 
The current leadership of the Morris County GOP is constantly in court battling its own members or conservative Republicans like Pastor Phil Rizzo. They have pursued this litigious strategy to the point of party bankruptcy. Lincoln counseled a better way:
 
“Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point out to them how the nominal winner is often a real loser—in fees, expenses, and waste of time. As a peacemaker the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man.”
 
Laura Ali’s full letter appears below… 

The Morris GOP AWOL on defense of parental rights.

The NJEA argues that removing any book from a school library is something akin to the book burning that went on in 1930s Germany. Of course, the NJEA and its allies think nothing of canceling an author with whom they disagree – mirroring a practice common in authoritarian regimes of all ideological stripes.
 
There is a great difference between canceling an author along with his or her work and deciding that certain reading material isn’t “age appropriate” for a certain audience. If it is all the same, then it would follow that Penthouse magazine and Hustler would be found on the shelves of school libraries, and their presence supported by the NJEA as a “defense against book burning.”
 
You can’t cancel the author of the Harry Potter series because you disagree with her, but then claim that setting age-appropriate standards at a school library is a bridge too far. But that’s what’s being done at the Roxbury School District in Morris County. This recent Fox News coverage explains the controversy:

“The battle for our children’s future is not being fought in China or in the Middle East. It’s happening inside their minds and inside our classrooms.”

Roxbury has become ground zero in the fight for parental rights in New Jersey. Advocates and parents are even being sued by a board of education employee, a school librarian, for pushing back and demanding that the board remove certain sexually explicit books from the school library. Books that parents believe are inappropriate for their minor children.
 
Remember, unlike those who want to cancel author J.K. Rowling, an adult, for having an opinion – these parents only wish to limit the access their minor children have to this material. Adults are free to do what they like (and that goes for their children, once they are adults).
 
At a meeting of the Board of Education on Monday night, parental rights advocates from around the state showed up to support the parents being sued and to speak out in their defense. But not the Morris County GOP. Not the Republican establishment.
 
Parental rights advocate Josh Aikens was there. Aikens, a candidate for Assembly, was joined by running mate Jason Sarnoski. Aikens delivered an impassioned defense of parental rights – as he has hundreds of times before throughout his effort to recruit and train conservative school board candidates. But where were all those Republicans who claim to be “conservative” and claim to be “pro-parent”.
 
Are the language pimps who run the campaigns of GOP establishment politicians doing to the phrase “pro-parent” what they did to the word “conservative”?
 
A year ago, the GOP legislative caucuses were big on parental rights. After all, parental rights is the issue responsible for Republicans winning in Virginia in 2021 and for Florida going from a purple state to one that is bright red.  
 
But then a GOP State Senator stood up in caucus and claimed a family member was “transitioning”. And that’s how quickly the rot sets in. Never underestimate the power of the personal to undermine policy. To a GOP leadership unsure of its principles, not wishing to offend a colleague is a ready excuse to take the chicken run on a controversial issue.
 
Overnight… the GOP’s digital and social media campaign in support of parental rights dried up. Now, “pro-parent” is just a convenient label, to be applied on campaign mailings, and media advertisements – by the language pimps who run establishment politicians’ campaigns. A label that, if allowed to, will be forgotten the moment the election is over.