Will Matt Platkin break the back of the Democrat Party in NJ?

By Rubashov

Across the Western world, the idea that parents have the right to mentor and guide their children is the wall against which the LGBTQ+ sea is breaking. This is happening even in Canada, which – since the early 1960’s – has led the world in acceptance of what were once called “gay rights” and was one of the first nations to adopt same-sex marriage (2003).
 
In a National Post column (June 26, 2023: “After 50 years, Canadians encounter an LGBT frontier they don’t support”), Canadian journalist Tristin Hopper outlined the backlash the LGBTQ+ cause is taking over its perceived targeting of children:
 
After more than 50 years of being impressively ahead of the curve on gay and trans rights issues, Canadians may have finally encountered an LGBT issue that they consider a bridge too far.
 
New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs recently took the controversial stand of becoming the first high-profile Canadian politician to resist a policy of having public schools accommodate the gender transition of young students without informing parents.
 
…according to a Leger poll last May, a clear majority of Canadians are on Higgs’ side. Of respondents, 57 per cent agreed with Higgs, while a mere 18 per cent agreed that schools should continue facilitating gender transitions without parental consent.
 
For such a roundly disliked policy, however, it’s already standard practice across much of the country. In school districts from Ontario to B.C., the official policy is that if a student claims to be another gender, teachers and staff must immediately “affirm” the new identity without question. And if the student requests, the details of their new identity are concealed from their parents…
 
It's very much the same situation in New Jersey, where a policy that not only negates the involvement of parents in their children’s lives but actively obstructs it was allowed to take hold. Look at the plainly political definitions being used to underpin the policy. If an education system adopts radical ideological terminology to define a policy, the education that follows is little more than propaganda. In this regard, the parallels between New Jersey’s schools and those of, say, the old Soviet Union are striking.
 
Some argue that the terminology used has a religious or pseudo-religious aspect to it. The pejorative term “deadnaming” – which seeks to shame those who use an individual’s legal or “birth” name – reeks of the practice of renaming that goes on in cults and some religious orders.
 
Meanwhile, the education of children is going down the toilet – with reading and math scores plummeting. Axios.com points this out in a recent article (June 21, 2023):
 
American students' test scores in math and reading got significantly worse last year — continuing a decade-long freefall. The decline in math scores last year was the biggest in the past 50 years, according to newly released federal data.
 
The findings come from a test known as "The Nation's Report Card" — a continuous, national assessment of 13-year-old students. Results were distributed by the National Center for Education Statistics, a branch of the Education Department…
 
The average math score for 13-year-olds declined 9 points between the 2019-20 and 2022-23 school years.
 
The average reading score for 13-year-olds declined 4 points between the 2019-20 and 2022-23 school years.
 
About 8,700 students took the assessments at about 460 schools across the country.
 
The lowest-performing students scored at levels last recorded in the 1970s, when the assessment began. Scores declined among all racial and ethnic groups, and among both male and female students, and across urban, suburban, and rural areas.
 
Enrollment in algebra dropped from 34% of 13-year-olds in 2012 to 24% in 2023.
 
And fewer students said they frequently read for fun, which is associated with higher achievement.
 
Enter Attorney General Matt Platkin – as radical as any Soros prosecutor – who is attempting to use the brute hand of government to beat parents into line. Yesterday, Platkin and Acting Department of Education Commissioner Angelica Allen-McMillan threatened parents to stay out of their children’s lives and re-affirmed that children belong to the state. What’s next? Will they give them uniforms (perhaps they have?) and call them the “Murphy Youth” (or “Jugend”, in the original German)?

So, we have a wasteful education system (arguably the nation's most expensive) delivering Woke ideology but not math and reading, and more wasteful spending on enforcing a policy that splits children from their parents. How long are people going to want to pay for that?
 
And where has the state’s Republican Party been in all of this? How many Republican Senators voted to confirm Matt Platkin? How many will vote to confirm Angelica Allen-McMillan?
 
Why didn’t the party of opposition speak up while it was happening? Good question… especially when the origins of many of these noxious policies date back to the administration of the last Republican Governor – Chris Christie. But that is for another column.
 
Even without a political party in its corner, there is parental outrage, and that can be a mighty thing. It’s been shown that parents who are motivated into action to protect their relationship with their children can become profoundly motivated voters.
 
The National Post column continues:
 
“It’s not a benign act. It’s a psychological intervention — and it’s not a minor psychological intervention — that teachers and counsellors are entering into without any psychological training at all,” said one Ontario mother, a former academic, whose child had their new name and pronouns immediately adopted by the Hamilton-Wentworth school board.
 
…In a 2021 Nanos survey, Canadian support for transgender rights dropped off a cliff when respondents were asked about instances of minors pursuing surgery or hormone treatment. In such cases, 72 per cent of Canadians said that it couldn’t be left to personal choice, and that there needed to be “strict requirements” on health-care officials giving the green light to a young person “irreversibly” altering their body.
 
A similar skepticism is already sweeping Europe, where some of the world’s most gay and trans-friendly countries have run up against a brick wall of public and even medical opinion when it comes to the gender transitioning of minors.
 
In just the last few months, many of the countries on which Canada usually takes its cues on progressive issues – Norway, Sweden, Finland, and the Netherlands — have dialed back official recommendations on so-called “gender affirming” care. While it’s still legal to medically transition minors in those countries, public health agencies are now saying it should be an extraordinarily rare occurrence, and not a routine treatment for gender dysphoria.
 
Meanwhile, the LGBTQ+ movement isn’t doing itself any favors. For example, at a recent “Pride” celebration (officially, the “NYC Drag March” on June 23rd), revelers broke into a chant of “we’re coming for your children”. Snopes checked the incident and even that far-Left “fact-checker” had to admit that it was “true”. 

“We’re coming for your children.”

Yesterday, Attorney General Matt Platkin and Acting Department of Education Commissioner Angelica Allen-McMillan issued a bureaucratic version of the above.

Gov. Murphy puts convicted felon in charge at Education. Malinowski, Kim, Sherrill silent.

Marcellus Jackson is a corrupt politician.  A crook.  He took a $26,000 bribe, was caught by the FBI, and was sentenced to prison and fined. 

That should have been an end to his time on the public payroll.  But Marcellus Jackson is a Democrat.  A politically-connected Democrat who worked on Governor Phil Murphy’s 2017 campaign. 

And now he’s been rewarded… with our tax dollars.  Over the summer, Marcellus Jackson was handed a $70,000-a-year-job as a “special assistant” in the New Jersey Department of Education.  He’ll be running the Education Department’s Office of Civic & Social Engagement. 

The education of children?  Civic and social engagement?  A corrupt politician  who took bribes?

Governor Murphy claims that Jackson is “a good example” that he “hopes we see a lot more of.”

What does he mean by that?

More convicted criminals getting taxpayer-funded jobs? 

More corrupt politicians getting back on the gravy train?

More criminals involved in the education of our children?

Has recreational marijuana been decriminalized early in some places?

This is the radical program of Democratic Socialism on display.  Murphy is one of its national adherents.

Which brings us to congressional candidate Tom Malinowski.  He links to a Democratic Socialist group right on his campaign website.  A few weeks back, Tom Malinowski went on national media to make the claim that his party – the Democrats – were the party of “law & order”. 

No kidding.  He really said that about his party.  The party of abolish ICE.  Sanctuary States.  Resist the elected government of the United States.  Give convicted criminals top taxpayer-funded jobs.  Law & Order????

Of course, Tom Malinowski has had nothing to say about the appointment of Marcellus Jackson.  Crickets, as they say.

That goes for congressional candidate Andy Kim too.  Crickets.

And congressional candidate Mikie Sherrill.  Crickets.

To check out the original news story that outed the hiring of Marcellus Jackson, follow this link…

https://www.politico.com/states/new-jersey/story/2018/09/17/murphy-administration-hires-former-council-member-who-served-prison-time-for-bribery-614629

The Quinnipiac Poll: Manufacturing Consent

If you want a picture of how the establishment manufactures a false consensus, you need go no further than the Quinnipiac University Poll released last month:

https://poll.qu.edu/images/polling/nj/nj02012017_Nu673pkc.pdf/

Let's start with the subject line.  It read:  "Quinnipiac University Poll shows NJ Majority Favors Affordable Housing."

Sure.  And how many people support un-affordable housing?  That's a thumb on the scale for a start.

We suspect that if you were to switch the term "affordable" for terms like "taxpayer-subsidized" or "builder-subsidized" or just plain "subsidized" housing, you would get a very different response.  Try the phrase "Section-8" if you really want to get a howl!

And you are never going to get a true picture by wording the question this way:

12. As you may know, the New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled that all New Jersey communities must allow the development of affordable housing for middle class and low income people.  Do you agree or disagree with this New Jersey Supreme Court decision?

Most people think of themselves as middle class.  This is like asking, "the New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled that all New Jersey communities must allow the development of affordable housing for people like you.  Do you agree or disagree with this New Jersey Supreme Court decision?"

That's an elbow on the scale for sure.  Go ahead, test it without the "middle class" and see what happens.  We dare you.

And here is a muddle designed to achieve a predetermined outcome: 

19. Do you think the state should provide every school district the same amount of funding per student, or do you think the state should continue to provide low income school districts with additional funding per student to make up for lower funding from property taxes?

Is Hoboken a "low income" school district?  Is Jersey City?  Is there not enough wealth present in those communities to support the education of the children who live there?

And what is meant by "additional funding"?  A little vague isn't it?  Let's see what happens when you plug in a figure like $15,000 per student or $20,000 or more?

Here is a question that you will never see in a Quinnipiac University Poll:  "Do you think low income taxpayers from rural and suburban New Jersey should subsidize urban school districts in communities like Hoboken and Jersey City?" 

This is how the establishment avoids discussion of the topics it would rather not discuss.  The State Supreme Court's own Doyne report showed that half of the state's economically-disadvantaged children fell outside those so-called "low income" school districts presently served by the status quo.  The Brookings Institute has studied and warned of the explosion of suburban poverty since the Great Recession, but in New Jersey, we don't discuss such things.

Academic polling, once used to ignite conversation, is being used to stifle it in New Jersey.  Even putting a finer point on a question, for instance, by identifying the "unelected" State Supreme Court as "ordering" the "elected" Legislature, would cause respondents to consider the question differently and produce a different set of results.  As academics, you would think such considerations would excite the intellectual curiosity, but apparently not.  That's not what they do.  Their job is to club all non-conformers into the prescribed patterns of thought.

Instead of providing an outlet for alternative points of view, much of the polling done by the political class in New Jersey is conformist by design too.  Keep your head down, get paid, and do not question the shibboleths.

We have just been through a national election in which the weaknesses of conformist polling were stunningly exposed.  We found that not only could you think the unthinkable, you could say it too, and you could be elected President of the United States by saying it.  It wasn't the populists who elected Donald Trump, it was the pollsters and academics who had confidently told people for years that they could safely ignore everything he talked about.

Something for the GOP Senate caucus to think about as it tries to deep six the "fair school funding" argument in favor of a more conformist message.  You might want not to believe it, the profs at Quinnipiac might not want to believe it either, but Donald Trump really did happen.  Reality does have a way of giving La La Land a rude wake up.